Selection of Fruitful Significators


(Please note, extensive references have been made in drafting this article and important sources are:

  • a) KP & Astrology 1990
  • b) Astrosecrets & Krishnamurtipaddhati Parts 1, 2 and 3
  • c) III Reader of Late Shri K.S.Krishnamurtiji)

         More times than not, one may find that, when one wants to judge a particular matter, for example marriage, then almost all the nine planets come in as significators of either or all of the houses 2, 7 and 11. Such a situation is no way rare and all too common an area where many a KP Astrologer falters in selecting the right planets and rejecting the unfruitful ones. Most of the literature we have surveyed in KP Astrology to find an answer to this question, point us to one of the following two principles:

     1. Supposing a person who wants to know the time of marriage and also wants to find out the significators which will give marriage in their conjoined period. Then, according to this principle, first note the Sub in which each of the planets figuring as a significator is deposited. If that Sub Lord is a STRONG significator (see explanation below) of any or all houses of marriage (2, 7 or 11), then you have to select the planet as a Fruitful significator, else not! Also, the planet SHOULD NOT be a strong significator of the bhaava/s, which negate the bhaava in question – in this case 1, 6 and 10 for marriage. This is one of the most important methods of eliminating planets which are “merely tempters and not real significators”.

       ပထမဆံုးအေနနဲ႔ Sub-lord ကို အရင္စဥ္းစား။ Sub-lord သည္ သက္ဆိုင္ရာဘာဝေတြ တစ္ခု (သို႔) အားလံုးရဲ႕ အားေကာင္းတဲ့ အက်ိဳးေဆာင္္ျဖစ္မယ္ဆိုရင္ (ေအာက္တြင္ရွင္းျပထား) အဲဒီၿဂိဳဟ္ကို Fruitful significator အျဖစ္ယူပါ။ အဲဒီလိုမွမဟုတ္ရင္ မယူပါနဲ႔။

       အဲဒီ Sub-lord ေတြဟာ သက္ဆိုင္ရာဘာဝနဲ႔ ဆန္႔က်င္ဖက္ဘာဝေတြရဲ႕ အက်ိဳးေဆာင္ၿဂိဳဟ္လည္း ျဖစ္ေနမယ္ဆိုရင္ ၄င္းတို႔ကို ပယ္လိုက္ ပါ။

      ဆိုလိုတာက အိမ္ေထာင္ေရးအတြက္ဆိုရင္ ၂-တန္႔၊ ၇-တန္႔၊ ၁၁-တန္႔ ဘာဝေတြကိုစဥ္းစားရမယ္။ ၂-တန္႔၊ ၇-တန္႔၊ ၁၁-တန္႔ အက်ိဳးေဆာင္ ၿဂိဳဟ္ေတြဟာ အိမ္ေထာင္ေရးအတြက္ ဆန္႔က်င္ဖက္ျဖစ္တဲ့ ၁-တန္႔၊ ၆-တန္႔၊ ၁၀-တန္႔ ဘာဝေတြရဲ႕ အက်ိဳးေဆာင္ၿဂိဳဟ္ေတြလည္း ျဖစ္မယ္ဆိုရင္ ၄င္းတို႔ကို ပယ္လိုက္ပါ။

      (Strong significator means – Planet/s in the star of bhaava occupant/s, or, if there are no planets in its stars, the bhaava occupant itself, or if the bhaava is empty (no occupant), then the planet/s in the owners’ star/s, or, if again there are no planets in the owner’s star/s the owner himself – please remember, these conditions are mutually exclusive. That is, if and only if a bhaava occupant has NO PLANETS in his stars, he becomes a strong significator; likewise, IF AND ONLY IF a Bhaava is empty and there are no Planets in the owner’s stars, the bhaava owner becomes a strong significator!

         However, if there are planets occupying the occupants’ or owner’s star/s, then those planets and the not the occupant or the owner of the bhaava are considered as the strong significators of the bhaava. This is a rule reiterated by many illustrious scholars of KP Astrology in many of their articles and books.


(၁)။ ဘာဝတစ္ခုမွာ ရပ္တည္ေနတဲ့ ၿဂိဳဟ္ပိုင္နကၡတ္ကိုစီးထားတဲ့ၿဂိဳဟ္သည္ ပထမ အားအေကာင္းဆံုး။

(၂)။ ဘာဝတစ္ခုမွာ ရပ္တည္ေနတဲ့ ၿဂိဳဟ္သည္ ဒုတိယ အားအေကာင္းဆံုး။

(၃)။ ဘာဝသခင္ၿဂိဳဟ္ပိုင္နကၡတ္ကိုစီးထားတဲ့ၿဂိဳဟ္သည္ တတိယ အားအေကာင္းဆံုး။

(၄)။ ဘာဝသခင္ၿဂိဳဟ္သည္ စတုတၳ အားအေကာင္းဆံုး။


  1. The second principle in order to eliminate the weak planets is by considering the ruling planets. Here again, you have to select the ruling planets which are deposited in the SUB of such a planet which is a strong significator of the bhaava matter concerned. Again the planet/s which represent 2, 7 or 11 and 1, 6 or 10 (this is only for the marriage example and for other matters, consider the respective representative houses and their negation houses) have to be rejected outright as they always do harm to the matter at hand and never good.

      ဒုတိယေရြးခ်ယ္တဲ့ နည္းလမ္းကေတာ့ RP(စိုးမိုးၿဂိဳဟ္)ေတြကို အသံုးခ်ျခင္းပါပဲ။ ဒီေနရာမွာလည္း RP တိုင္းက Strong significator မဟုတ္ပါဘူး။ RP ေတြထဲကမွ အထက္ကေဖာ္ျပထားသလို Sub-lord ေတြနဲ႔ ျပန္ၿပီးေရြးထုတ္ရမွာပါ။

         It may become necessary to apply one or both of the above principles depending on the number of planets you get as significators. Please remember, ONLY Strong Significators truly indicate the fructification of the event and are crucial in timing an event. The “weak significators” only fortify the event and may help to bring it to completion. But the event should and will always materialize in the Dasha, Bhukti Antara of the Strong Significator/s.

       အထက္ကေဖာ္ျပထားတဲ့ နည္းလမ္း တစ္ခု(သို႔) ႏွစ္ခုလံုးကိုသံုး၍ Strong Significators ေတြကို ေရြးခ်ယ္ပါ။ Strong Significators   ေတြကသာလွ်င္ အျဖစ္အပ်က္တစ္ခု ျဖစ္ပ်က္မည့္ အခ်ိန္ကာလကို ေဖာ္ျပေပးမွာ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။ Weak significators ေတြကေတာ့ အားျဖည့္ေပး တာေလာက္ပဲရွိပါမယ္။

သို႔ေသာ္ အျဖစ္အပ်က္ေတြ တကယ္ျဖစ္တာကေတာ့ Strong Significators ေတြရဲ႕ ဒသာ၊ ဘုတၱိ၊ အႏၲရ ေတြမွာပဲ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။

         In conclusion, let us see what weak significators are:

  1. a) If a planet A occupies the II Bhaava and B and C are in the Star of A, then B and C are the “Strongest Significators of Bhaava II”.

       Planet “A” ဟာ ၂-တန္႔ဘာဝမွာ ရပ္တည္ၿပီး B နဲ႔ C တို႔ဟာ A ပိုင္နကၡတ္ကို စီးထားမယ္ဆိုရင္ B နဲ႔ C တို႔ဟာ ၂-တန္႔ဘာဝရဲ႕ အားေကာင္းတဲ့ အက်ိဳးေဆာင္ၿဂိဳဟ္ေတြ ျဖစ္လာမွာ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။

  1. b) If the condition in (a) is true, then the planet A itself which is the occupant of the II Bhaava, is rendered only a weak significator of the bhaava. However, that does not mean that planet A will never contribute to the bhaava matters or the results of II Bhaava never materialize during the period governed by planet A. But to time an event, we should consider only planets B and C in the first place in preference to A. Please bear in mind that planet A still gives the result of the bhaava it occupies, but when it has planets deposited in its star/s, it is only connected to the bhaava and not a strong significator of the bhaava.

        သူ႔နကၡတ္ကို စီးထားတဲ့ၿဂိဳဟ္ရွိၿပီဆိုရင္ သူဟာ အဲဒီဘာဝကို ဆက္သြယ္ထားတာသာျဖစ္ၿပီး (Only connected) အဲဒီဘာဝရဲ႕ Strong significator မဟုတ္ေတာ့ပါဘူး။

  1. c) Now let us come to planets which are in conjunction with planets B and C. Let us for example say that planet M is in conjunction with planet B. If a true conjunction exists between planet B and M (taking the western aspects orb into consideration as ruled by our Guruji), then the planet M is also rendered as a Strong Significator of the II Bhaava. It is then more powerful than planet A itself as a significator of the II Bhaava.

          Planet “B” နဲ႔ “C” တို႔နဲ႔ ပူးထားတဲ့ၿဂိဳဟ္ေတြရွိလာၿပီဆိုရင္၊ ဥပမာ- “M” က “B” နဲ႔ပူးတယ္ ဆိုၾကပါစို႔။ (ၿဂိဳဟ္ပူးက အေနာက္တိုင္းၿဂိဳဟ္ပူး အတိုင္း သူ႔ရဲ႕ Orb ထဲမွာ ရွိရမယ္။) ဒါဆိုရင္ Planet “M” ဟာလည္း “A” ထက္ပိုအားေကာင္းတဲ့ ၂-တန္႔ဘာဝရဲ႕ အက်ိဳးေဆာင္ၿဂိဳဟ္ေတြ   ျဖစ္လာမွာ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။

  1. d) Suppose there is no true conjunction, and planet M happens to occupy only the same sign as planet B (as taken in classical Vedic astrology – two planets in the same sign are said to be in conjunction), then the planet M is a weak significator of the II Bhaava – that is, it is only connected to the II Bhaava. In strength it is weaker than planet A itself which is the occupant of the II Bhaava.

      တကယ္လို႔ “M” ဟာ “B” နဲ႔ Western နည္းအရ အတိအက် မပူးဘူးဆိုရင္ “M” ဟာ ၂-တန္႔ဘာဝနဲ႔ ဆက္သြယ္တာပဲ ရွိၿပီးေတာ့ ၂-တန္႔မွာရပ္တဲ့ “A” ထက္ေတာင္ အားနည္းသြားမွာပါ။

  1. e) In another case, let us consider a planet Q which is aspected by planet B. Now B is a strong significator of II Bhaava by being deposited in the star of planet A, the occupant of the bhaava. However, because planet Q is only aspected by planet B, planet Q is said to be only connected to the II Bhaava, or in other words, is a weak significator of the II Bhaava.

          ေနာက္တစ္ခုက Planet “Q” သည္ ၂-တန္႔ဘာဝရဲ႕ အားေကာင္းတဲ့ အက်ိဳးေဆာင္ၿဂိဳဟ္ျဖစ္တဲ့ “B” ရဲ႕ အျမင္ခံထား ရေသာ္လည္း Planet “Q” ကို ၂-တန္႔ဘာဝနဲ႔ ဆက္သြယ္တယ္လို႔ပဲ ေျပာရပါမယ္။ သူဟာ ၂-တန္႔ဘာဝရဲ႕ အားနည္းတဲ့ အက်ိဳးေဆာင္ၿဂိဳဟ္သာျဖစ္ပါမယ္။

  1. f) However, please note….. if the planet in conjunction or aspect of the strong significator is actually a Node (Rahu or Ketu) then the node becomes a Strong Significator of the bhaava concerned. That is because the nodes are very powerful. Especially if there is a true conjunction with a node, the node can be taken in the place of the actual significator planet because the node is so powerful.

       ဒါေပမယ့္ အားေကာင္းတဲ့ အက်ိဳးေဆာင္ၿဂိဳဟ္တစ္လံုးရဲ႕ ပူး/ျမင္ခံရတဲ့ ၿဂိဳဟ္က Node (Rahu or Ketu) ျဖစ္ရင္ အဲဒီ Node (Rahu or Ketu) ဟာ သက္ဆိုင္ရာဘာဝရဲ႕ အားေကာင္းတဲ့ အက်ိဳးေဆာင္ၿဂိဳဟ္တစ္လံုးျဖစ္လာပါတယ္။ ဘာျဖစ္လို႔လဲဆိုေတာ့ Nodes ေတြဟာ very powerful ျဖစ္ၾကလို႔ပါ။ အထူးသျဖင့္ အားေကာင္းတဲ့အက်ိဳးေဆာင္ၿဂိဳဟ္ တစ္လံုးဟာ Node (Rahu or Ketu) တစ္လံုးနဲ႔ အတိအက် ပူးထားရင္ (true conjunction) တကယ့္အက်ိဳးေဆာင္ၿဂိဳဟ္ ေနရာမွာ အဲဒီ Node (Rahu or Ketu) ကို အစားထိုးရပါမယ္။ ဘာျဖစ္လို႔လဲဆိုေတာ့ Nodes ေတြဟာ အလြန္အားေကာင္း ၾကလို႔ပါ။

         I hope, this clarifies the topic of selecting the most fruitful significators in judging any event. Please note, that this is equally applicable to both natal and horary charts and is one of the most important (and believe me, also the most difficult and confusing) aspects of Krishnamurtipaddhati.

          ဤနည္းကို မူလဇာတာႏွင့္ ဟူးရားဇာတာ ႏွစ္ခုစလံုးတြင္ အသံုးျပဳႏိုင္သည္။




FB: Sayauzarni KP

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s